Please stop placing advertising material for your company on the air suspension page.(giving a company credit for design is not advertising) Please stop placing incorrect and unsubstantiated information on the air suspension page (it is both correct and substantial thank you very much)- Happy to work with you to improve the page but your comments are not academically robust (they are though) and are not true (?? Please elaborate??). Please advertise your company via Google and not Wikipedia.(nameing a company is not unusual on wiki)

If you continue vandalising the page with advertising material for your organisation then you will be reported (and you(. As stated I am happy to work with you as you clearly wish to make a contribution but what is written must be true (it is), academically researched (it is), not advertising for your company(it isn't, it's informative like wiki should be), and unbiased showing both pros and cons for the different types of suspension (sorry but full air is superior to semi-air in every way but price!! . — Preceding unsigned comment added by FabulousPhil (talkcontribs) 09:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Phil,

My additions are true and the engineering behind it is solid. Please leave this to the professionals. It is allowed to nanamem companies on Wikipedia, please bully someone else.