September 2022 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.36.220.78 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a new user in the middle of a sockpuppet investigation and I am requested to offer as much evidence to prove that I am not a sockpuppet and even requested Check. I am always editing with new evidence and with request. User.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WorldCreaterFighter I did not receive a single warning or a single complain for my actions. I am currently in a sockpuppet investigation and trying with the best of my ability to survive by presenting the best evidence I can offer. Giving me a 1 month block is already giving me death sentence because tomorrow or a week later could be the end of me and is not because of IP connection but behavioral evidence. I do not understand why I am being treated so harshly without being given even single warning while users were given multiple warning disrupting editing in other articles. If you had given me a warning than I know my actions were wrong but I am currently only make more editing than I used to because I am in a sockpuppet investigation.82.36.220.78 (talk) 02:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This has nothing to do with any sockpuppetry allegation against you (if it did, the block would be indefinite) and everything to do with the way you barged into the SPI and started posting walls o'text that made everyone's eyes glaze over. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case: I have no idea what to do next. It says I cannot reply so use the full page editor. Obviously my 1 month block had nothing to do with sockpuppetry allegation, it is the fact that I never once received a warning. Are there risk for a 2nd unblock request even if you ask nicely? if there are risks, I rather wait for a month.82.36.220.78 (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I posted my official Turkish accounts, my naked IP. What other evidences should I provide ???Ghizz Archus (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Made it quick82.36.220.78 (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
To Ghizz Archus, don't bother making a reply because it won't work out. It's tiring me out just to keep reloading the page every few seconds.
Even if I make in time it's almost impossible to make it under a minute. I made it 39 seconds but yet wikipedia still says it was a minute.
Let's forget doing that. You have more than enough evidence that proves we are two different people
82.36.220.78 (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply