February 2021

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Aosta Valley. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 10:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aosta Valley. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 10:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aosta Valley, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Aosta Valley was changed by 79.11.184.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97199 on 2021-02-25T10:11:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply