I have reviewed your edits to Ix Chel, and it appears that your edits were in fact helpful to the article. My apologies for the revert; however edits only get looked at for a few seconds tops, before we click the revert button which actually does all the work. I must have accidentally clicked on you instead of someone else. Your warning has been removed.

ChrischTalk 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks77.162.130.139 11:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Itzamna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Mr Fink 01:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Itzamna, you will be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink 02:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

January 2008Edit

  Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Maya civilization. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Your edit broke a link, although it may be otherwise correct, but unsourced. -- Alexf(Talk/Contribs) 15:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

October 2008Edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Maya religion. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 10:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Please see my message to you. Your 'vandalizer', 77.162.130.139 (talk) 11:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edits would last longer on wikipedia if they were accompanied by references to sources. I am convinced that most of your edits are factual but as long as they are not supported by references to reliable sources they may be removed at any time by other editors.·Maunus·ƛ· 11:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Could you become a bit more specific as to what is so obviously missing? There are references to the article, I will expand the list shortly.77.162.130.139 (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

References is not just the list of used literature. It is also prividing specific references for the claims you make using a note system. So that for example your description of Maya prayer[1] could be verifiable by including a citation to a specific academic work about prayer in maya religion prefereably with page number. For example a citation style could be the harvard style e.g. (Tedlock 2001 p.44) or you could use a tag note system <ref>Tedlock 2001 p.44</ref>. Please read the policy WP:CITE to know more about the citation policies in wikipedia.·Maunus·ƛ· 12:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response, I will add more specific references.77.162.130.139 (talk) 12:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Oscarthecat (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to God K. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

March 2009Edit

Sorry, I too often forget to identify myself. Inspect the small changes to the text, and you will easily see that they have been constructive.77.162.130.139 (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ixchel worked, so it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. If there are no notes, then there is no need for a "Notes" section. --Ericdn (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2009Edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Maya religion, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Unscented (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
What are you specifically referring to? I don't accept these cheap and hasty accusations of vandalism.77.162.130.139 (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I am specifically referring to the fact that you inserted text into the article claiming that the ancient mayans used cigars as ritual offerings - this obviously false information caused the rest of what you added to seem suspect. If you have any sources that support the facts you added to the article, then by all means, re-insert them. Look at the top of the page, and you'll see that other editors have mentioned this to you before.--Unscented (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Allen Edwardes. NorwegianBlue talk 21:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Since when is adding information "vandalization"? You behave like a dictator. Explain what you mean, and perhaps I can accept your criticism.77.162.130.139 (talk) 21:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Goddess IEdit

Hi there R. Very odd; I've had a look thru the deleted contributions history for this ip, and also your logon. I can't see anything that looks like Goddess I, and the logs show there's never been an article (whether deleted now or not) at that title. Couldn't see anything in the daily deletion log either (though there are 100s of deletions daily, might have overlooked).

Could it be possible, that you meant to save it, but somehow it didn't actually make it? Every now and then you can get logged out if the editing pane has been open a while. Dunno why that happens, but if you got unknowingly & temporarily logged out before saving, that wld prevent it fm being saved.

About what time (UTC) was it? Had you made multiple edits, or only the one with which you intended to create it? Could it have been named something different? It was when logged in as R, right? --cjllw ʘ TALK 12:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Reading how you described it a bit more attentively now, I think it is likely that you got logged out somehow, in between when you started and when you went to hit the save button. The wiki software would have seen you as an ip not a registered user, thus blocking the article from being saved. When you made the comment at Talk:Goddess I (which I guess was only minutes after?), you were logged out. If that's what's happened, then afraid there's no way to get it back, it was never saved in the 1st place...--cjllw ʘ TALK 12:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for giving attention to this incident, I'll resume working on the article soon. R.77.162.130.139 (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Maya Hero Twins has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 08:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, 77.162.130.139. You have new messages at Kotiwalo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

September 2009Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Maya textiles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NarSakSasLee (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

February 2010Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to San Bartolo (Maya site), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 13:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)I am afraid I don't get your point. As a matter of fact, I have been adding essential references to an article that was in a deplorable state before I started working on it.77.162.130.139 (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Uday Hussein has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 00:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC) OK, criticism taken.77.162.130.139 (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2010Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ah Kin has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Donald Duck (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Donald, I will explain myself.77.162.130.139 (talk) 21:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I've re-reverted... I think that you are a serious editor, with a considerable knowledge of the field; but in this case, I suspect that you have underestimated the confusion about the name forms for "god G", and would suggest another solution of the problem. See Talk:Ah Kin! JoergenB (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jakob Sporrenberg, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Salmanazar (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
I did make a change, but I fail to see why it should be unconstructive.77.162.130.139 (talk) 00:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A Macedonian (talk) 17:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Recent change to Museo Regional del Sureste de PeténEdit

Hi, I reverted your recent edits to Museo Regional del Sureste de Petén, not because I have any particular reason to doubt the information you supplied but rather because it does not reflect the cited source (a report by the Atlas Arqueológico de Petén, hyperlinked in the References section). If you have reason to believe the article is wrong as written, please also correct the citation, otherwise it gives the impression of original research. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!Edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Maya art. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (77.162.130.139) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Zad68 14:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Maya art with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maya art with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


Regarding the Maya Art article

There have been several wood figures in poor condition excavated from Mam-Mayan sites such as Zaceleu and Xela to name a few, all such figures being of kings and religious figures as was common in Maya society. In the article I have now included citation which explains in greater depth, the patronage system which is why many maya works of art were of such figures. I included the Tikal Lintel because it is one of the best known examples of Maya woodwork. Please understand if wikipedia had better images to substitute it I would use them but wiki's media library regarding Maya artifacts dose not have great pictures of everything.

Regarding the murals, i added the San Bartolo mural because it is the oldest known Maya mural discovered intact. Thank you for pointing out the incorrect "ball player" caption. I intended to put a mural of ball players and put this one instead without changing the correct image filename. I shall change it to the better ball player image once i locate it on wikimedia once more but for now have edited the caption with the correct information.

The ceramic vessel scan I added to the ceramics section is both a codex style AND chama style vessel. Codex type simply means that they are "Ceramic scenes and texts painted in black and red on a white underground, the equivalents of pages from the lost folding books, are referred to as being in 'codex style'." Chama style refers to their location of origin and the actual artistic style. I replaced the previous image of the codex with the one at Copan because, it is opened wide and displayed more visual representation, but feel free to change it back if you would like.

The books and hieroglyph section features heavily on the maya codices, as many of the ceramics are considered codices I thought it was appropriate for me to add the image. Additionall it is a scene from the Popol Vuh, perhaps the best known work of Maya writing, therefore I thought it was fitting.

I used photos of reproductions soley because there are not photos of these originals on wikipedia atm, however were there to be I would rather have them displayed. 69.235.196.188 (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

May 2013Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Philipp Bouhler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Mesoamerican ballgame reassessmentEdit

Mesoamerican ballgame, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — MusikAnimal talk 05:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)