75.166.118.17

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.166.118.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I was unfairly blocked. As you can see in the contributions there was no isuue today at all ranging from vandalism to personal attacks on other editors none of that. I would appreciate it if this block gets an in-depth review and be lifted--75.166.118.17 (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are a long term abuser known to us as the Denver LTA and you know it because you tried to have that page deleted.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.166.118.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was unfairly blocked and I would like to be unblocked please

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank a declined unblock request. Do not do so again, or you will lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit Conflict: @Yamla: I was unfairly blocked and other than gibberish and things on the talk page some good contributions have been made today--75.166.118.17 (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Given your edit history, I'm convinced you are Denver LTA. --Yamla (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Listen @Yamla: please I ain't anybody all I ask was be to unblocked because I did not vandalize anything. And those articles you reverted were accurate especially the one for KAAM because on June 5 they flipped to Christian Talk and not infomercials. So yes I deserve to be unblocked and no I ain't no Denver LTA and as far as I know I don't know who that is.--75.166.118.17 (talk) 23:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm not going to unblock you. But you are welcome to make a third unblock request. You'll need to explain the overlap in your editing and your attempt to blank the page about Denver LTA. --Yamla (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

I ain't Denver LTA but still I wanted that page deleted. who ever created it did it to be a bully and I don't like bully's And once again I have no Idea who Denver LTA is but certainly not me.--75.166.118.17 (talk) 23:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.166.118.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ain't Denver LTA and I would like to call for the page's deletion. And I would like to be unblocked please

Decline reason:

What you are saying isn't plausible. PhilKnight (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.166.118.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been explaining to you all all afternoon that the block in unfair and I deserve to be unblocked

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for the duration of the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 02:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---