Edit warring at Feral pigeon edit

Stop trying to ram your changes in at feral pigeon. Clearly they are not uncontroversial: you go out of your way to remove well-sourced material that does not conform to your preconceptions, try to reframe multiple sections to put WP:UNDUE emphasis on a badly sourced side-issue, and apparently hope that repeated edit-warring will get you your way. Well, that's not how this works. Consider this a formal warning for edit-warring. The next time you make these disputed changes without discussion, I will report you. Follow WP:BRD instead - your changes have been objected to, now make your case on the talk page and try to reach consensus. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Elmidae edits were made in an attempt to create a more neutral tone in article and highlight humane options for population control. There is enough exaggerated propaganda about feral pigeon populations that the tone of them being disease carrying vermin needing complete eradication does not belong on Wikipedia. I appreciate your warning and would further appreciate adjustments being made to the article in question that has a less harsh tone while keeping sources and remaining as factual as possible, whether from me, you, or any other editor. Feel free to keep the main meat of the article, while adjusting the verbiage. Thank you. Edit: Noted and transferred response on main talk page.