75.100.33.229

October 2022

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Positivism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Neither of the two amendments I suggested are of the kind that require a 'reliable source'. They concern the representation of two alleged criticisms of positivism as credible or serious, when obviously and on the face of it, neither of them are. You only have to read the text and think about it for a minute. And read my explanations. (I am a professional philosopher, incidentally.) The article is amateurish in its presentation of twentieth century philosophical positivism in these and other respects, but these are easily corrected. 75.100.33.229 (talk) 22:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---