Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

LBHS Cheerleader Investigation

edit

Hey Sarah/Sierra, both impersonators have been blocked from Wikipedia forever. They are not allowed to edit anything on Wikipedia either. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2010

edit
 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at info-en wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 18:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.4.126.141 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No comment on the recent actions of the IP or the recent User:LBHS Cheerleader incident, but I noticed this dynamic IP address is indef blocked. It is not common practice to indef block dynamic IPs as this IP could later represent an uninvolved user. By the way, if we bring WP:AGF into play here, and assume that this might be in fact a different person than the vandal, biting the newbies with indef blocks without even a warning is not common practice either. IMHO, this should at least be reduced to no more than one month, but that's just my opinion. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 3:19 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Only blocked for two weeks. TNXMan 20:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you check the block log before making this request? ;-) Tan | 39 20:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oops, egg on my face. Happens when you're in a hurry to get ready for a job that doesn't give a paycheck on time. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply