73.67.222.221

April 2018

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Leigh Bardugo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 15:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is actually the third time you've done this, I should have notified you earlier in case you didn't see my edit summaries. Please let me know if you have a source and need help implementing it into the article. Thanks!— TAnthony^Talk 15:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Leigh Bardugo. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 17:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Leigh Bardugo. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TAnthony^Talk 16:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Per my response to your comments at User_talk:TAnthony#ACTUAL_AGE_OF_AUTHOR_LEIGH_BARDUGO, your personal knowledge of Bardugo and her birthdate is not considered a reliable source. If this continues, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 16:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

THERE'S NOTHING CONTROVERSIAL NOR DEFAMATORY ABOUT INCLUDING MS. BARDUGO'S ACTUAL ACCURATE AGE! I REFERENCED MULTIPLE RELIABLE SOURCES TWICE! ARE YOU LEIGH OR HER REP? YOU KNOW SHE'S NOT 35, AND HER CONTINUED EFFORT TO SAY SO IS A LIE. SHE'S NOT AN ACTRESS NOR A MODEL. HER REAL AGE IS NOT DEFAMATORY. BEING IN ONE'S MID-40'S ISN'T A SHAMEFUL THING. IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T HURT A WRITER. PLEASE STOP EDITING MY CORRECTIONS OR I'LL HAVE YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS REVIEWED BY MANAGEMENT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.67.222.221 (talk) 15:36, May 11, 2018

No one is saying it is "shameful", but birthdates are considered controversial for any biography article. Further, every editor has the right and responsibility to remove unsourced information from the articles about living people. You HAVE NOT cited any WP:reliable sources attesting to her age, as I've explained elsewhere. Feel free to report me to the authorities, you are the one who is not following policy. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 16:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

birthdates are PART OF EVERY BIOGARPHY ARTICLE!!! They are not controversial, nor are they defamatory. And how are you even sourcing that? Personal opinion? It's simply not true. You take this tone like you're protecting the subject or preserving standards. You're in fact hiding core facts at the expense of accuracy. I think you're LB or her agent, and I think that makes you a violator of Wiki rules and standards. You're editing a public encyclopedia like it's your own PR brochure! It is not. I am a reliable source. I was there at 2 of hr birthday parties. Also, why didn't you attack the previous false younger statement of age calling her 35? Is it because it came from you? That's easy to find out and it's an offense that can get you blocked. 'Thanks'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.67.222.221 (talk) 15:16, May 17, 2018

73.67.222.221

I'm not affiliated with Bardugo. You, on the other hand, have repeatedly admitted to knowing her personally. Your accusations and threats are completely inappropriate, but by all means pursue any avenue against me you desire (good luck). Regardless of whether birthdates are controversial, you have been unable to identity an actual WP:Reliable source (by Wikipedia standards) that asserts a birthdate. THE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE AN EDITOR IS NOT CONSIDERED A RELIABLE SOURCE. I'm sure you were at her birthday party, but read the policy, that doesn't fly as a source. You can rant all you want, but any editor can remove unsourced information from any article, especially the biographies of living people. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 15:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michael Avenatti. — TAnthony^Talk 16:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC) i didn't add unsourced material to avenatti's page. i added one sentence that said there's no word yet why he graduated late from college. his states his birth date. is that controversial? he's another liar. are you associating yourself with that criminal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.67.222.221 (talk) 15:21, May 17, 2018

You added the phrase "when he was 25 years old instead of 22, the age most of his classmates were at graduation. No word yet what Mr. Avenatti did during this 3-year gap in his education" without a source. This is meaningless speculation, and is inappropriate for any article. I'm trying to be patient as you learn WP policy, but I suggest that you stop being so defensive when your edits are undone with a clear explanation as to why. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 15:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---