July 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Triple parentheses, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Your edit summary statement implies original research. You may ONLY cite reliable sources, not original thoughts or findings ViperSnake151  Talk  04:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re:

edit

That would be a primary source. They're not outright forbidden, but Wikipedia prefers secondary sources. ViperSnake151  Talk  12:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:69.47.172.189 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  12:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Triple parentheses. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

That comment was uncalled for

edit

  Your remarks may have been uncivil. Please be careful when making comments about other contributors, as they may consider them as personal attacks. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply