Welcome! edit

Hello, 68.32.41.19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Buddhist influences on Christianity edit

Please read WP:V and WP:RS. Also read WP:3RR regarding reverts. History2007 (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you cross WP:3RR you can be blocked, so stop, and discuss on article talk. History2007 (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources edit

Please read WP:RS and WP:OR. And create an account. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 19:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

  Your addition to Buddhist influences on Christianity has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Short quotes are acceptable if properly attributable, but whole paragraphs are simple copyright violation Bob Re-born (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Buddhist influences on Christianity, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Copyright Violation of http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0hkoAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA496&lpg=PA496&dq=%22is+supposed+to+utter,+on+the+vanity+of+the+world%22&source=bl&ots=IqGBvz5mU7&sig=-l6PjT8vX4nZ_WAJdrJigYYeTsQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n0TzUKjJMvOR0QXJsoGADw&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22is%20supposed%20to%20utter%2C%20on%20the%20vanity%20of%20the%20world%22&f=false  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jan 19 2013 edit

I have again asked this IP to read WP:RS but I do not seem to be getting very far.... He just adds commentary with a ref to a 19th century source to the lede, and one has to even to do work to find out what he is saying.. Very frustrating. History2007 (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, your right I am confused, I apologize. What is the difference between a 19th century scholar and one today?
Same difference as a Model-T and 2012 vehicle technology. Older items get discredited n time. History2007 (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

(actually) Final warning edit

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. Your desire to improve the project is a good thing, but please take note of the rules we have set in place. As other editors have mentioned, everything added to an article must come backed by a reliable source; for our readers' sake, we want to keep things verifiable.

However, teaching policy isn't why I'm here. I'm here because you've already received a final warning against edit-warring with other editors. I'm giving you one more chance; if you'd like to continue editing, please do not continue editing Buddhist influences on Christianity without first reaching consensus with the other editors on the talk page of said article. If you do not heed this warning, you will be blocked for an appropriate period of time.

Feel free to pose any questions here, on my talk page, or on the talk page of the article. Thank you, m.o.p 20:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you.
You've added again the Jesus Godama Sources, this time to Buddhism and Christianity diff, despite previous discussions and warnings regarding your editing-behaviour. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

IP is knowingly editing against policy edit

Given that the IP admits he knows he is editing against policy, something needs to be done. History2007 (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  m.o.p 22:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013 edit

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Personal threats?. Thank you.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Yunshui  08:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.