August 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Monta Vista High School, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Monta Vista High School, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019 Response

edit

None of my contributions could be considered disruptive editing. I take offense at the allegation. The threats of repercussions are unjustified, ill considered and malicious.

The user who made the allegation and threats removed the majority of the content of the article at issue in March/April (of 2019). Additional content was removed in April 2018 by a user with a similar screen name and is possibly the same person. When I tried to restore this information, and add new information, the same user deleted the restorations and additions.

Among the content removed wholesale was information about a Wall Street Journal article covering the topic, notable demographic information, significant awards received that are acknowledged elsewhere in Wikipedia and objective performance measures. Coverage of the topic by the following third party sources was also deleted in its entirety: the Washington Post, U.S. News and World Reports, Niche, Business Insider and the Los Angeles Times.

As a sense of the magnitude of content removed wholesale, one of the deletions brought the content from 11,913 bytes to 4,704 bytes.

Much of this content is informative and useful for those interested in the topic. All was reliably sourced. Most was objective and verifiable.

See the article's talk page for more information.