August 2007

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2350 BP eruption of Mount Meager. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Brusegadi 21:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I think you just sent that message to about 10% of suddenlink's users.

October 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Whip-poor-will has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Motor skills disorder has been reverted.
Your edit here to Motor skills disorder was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://i55.tinypic.com/10nvo2e.png) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to 42 (number), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 15:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Quaker Oats Company, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Falcon8765. An edit you recently made to Alvin Dark seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Falcon8765 (TALK) 19:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Alvin Dark with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 19:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Amanda Palmer because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 11:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015

edit

  Your recent edit to Tyler, Texas appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Andy Carroll. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm UW Dawgs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply