51.7.23.28

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.7.23.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked with the claim of "Long-term abuse". This claim is absolutely, utterly false, and there is no possible reason to accuse me of it. A glance at my edits will suffice to see that they are concerted efforts to improve articles. 51.7.23.28 (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There is compelling behavioral evidence that you are a banned editor. You are not welcome to edit Wikipedia unless and until the ban is resolved. Huon (talk) 23:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.7.23.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Compelling behavioural evidence?? There is obviously no such thing. I edit articles to improve them, and I follow policies and guidelines. You find that to be evidence of "long term abuse"? There is no possible reason to insult me in this way, and I should not have been blocked as I have clearly done nothing wrong. 51.7.23.28 (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra 23:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.7.23.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Come on. The reason for the block is unexplained, and inexplicable. I have made a handful of edits today, all of which substantially improved poor quality articles. Just bloody look at the edits! There is no possible explanation for this block! It is obvious that it was not necessary to "prevent damage or disruption", because I obviously, obviously, obviously, was not damaging or disrupting anything! If you somehow believed otherwise, you would be able to specify which edit concerned you. But nobody has done that. It is insulting and bizarre to be treated in this way. 51.7.23.28 (talk) 23:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Banned means banned. Doesn't matter if your edits are good. Find a new hobby. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Sro23 - what motivated your hit-and-run attack on me? What on Earth about my substantial improvements to articles upset you so much that you had to block and slander me? 51.7.23.28 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---