5.64.200.38

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to James McMurdock, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ADifferentMan (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at James McMurdock, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to James McMurdock, you may be blocked from editing. Porterjoh (talk) 21:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Apologies if explanation for removal was added to the wrong place or not clear. Removed text was in line with professional legal advice - specifically Article 8 of the Human Rights Act / European Convention on Human Rights and the Rehabilitation of Offenders act 1974. Please remove all reference to the spent conviction. Publishing of the same was highly problematic under law as is reference to it here. 5.64.200.38 (talk) 21:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

This seems to be an unnecessarily complex way of resolving a simple matter. Please act in the best interest of all parties and revert back to my original edits. Best regards 5.64.200.38 (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I would add that Wikipedia is governed by Florida law, not UK or European law. There may be a legitimate debate about whether we should refrain from mentioning spent convictions, but this could be a big step, needs discussion. I would add that a number of British newspapers have mentioned his conviction without facing legal action. PatGallacher (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 5.64.200.38. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page James McMurdock, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:5.64.200.38 reported by User:Tacyarg (Result: ). Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

---