5.36.34.41

Reverting when sources are given

Refrain from edit-warring. Numerous sources have already been given as evidence for it. If you take issue to it then you should first answer what I put below in the talk page. Also please read WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY.-Mountain157 (talk)

Mountain157 Let me highlights key points from WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY since I believe you have also not read it.:

1) Although some rules may be enforced, the written rules themselves do not set accepted practice. *Rather, they document already existing community CONSENSUS regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected.*

2) Disagreements are resolved through CONSENSUS-BASED discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves may be changed to reflect evolving CONSENSUS.

I saw your discussion with User Wikiemirati. And you failed you reach any consensus on the talk page. Your own cited Wikipedia rule proves you are wrong.

So I would request you to kindly revert your change and go discuss it again on talk page and see if you reach any consensus.

Similarly, what you are trying to prove is basically mentioned down on that page. It has it's own section. You are free to add information there. 5.36.34.41 (talk) 21:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

---