User talk:49TL/Archive-21

InformationThis is the FireFox talk page archive 21.

---

If you want to leave me a message, please see my current talk page.

Geez

I guess this means n00bs aren't welcome on Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of Boppers Cafe under CSD A7?

While I care nothing for the article Boppers Cafe and it would have been deleted in any case, I see nothing in WP:CSD justifying its speedy deletion. CSD A7 (non-notable individuals or groups) does not cover instututions, corporations, businesses, buildings, or the like. Please be careful not to assume A7 covers more than it does. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 01:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism

Why did you remove Ashida Kim's photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast (talk • contribs)

Rajput

soo, Firefox, what are your plans for Rajput? We cannot wait for peace to break out in South Asia before unprotecting. My take on the situation is that we have several users prepared for civil debate, viz. Taaoo (talk · contribs), ImpuMozhi (talk · contribs), AMbroodEY (talk · contribs), Wisesabre (talk · contribs), with varying grasp of civility, but they represent both camps and I think they could work together. The only users showing complete obstinance are DPSingh (talk · contribs), Ss india (talk · contribs), Shivraj Singh (talk · contribs) plus their assorted IPs. SS and DP are hopeless cases, but Shivraj has his light moments, and he could possibly reform if the environment was better. If we can agree on a zero tolerance policy for trolling, PA and removal of sourced statements (immediate blocks), I do think the users mentioned could get some work done. You would, however, have to babysit the article, and take the abuse from the trolls you block. dab (ᛏ) 09:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

why do you think I am involved with the article? The trolls claim I have a "muslim pov", but they're trolls. I do not pretend to have knowledge on the topic, let alone a pov. I am involved as an admin, with getting the discussion back on track, just like you are. You'll find the trolls will claim you are "involved" soon enough, if you dare insist that Muslims should be allowed to edit Wikipedia just like Hindus. dab (ᛏ) 12:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

I reverted for purely technical reasons, removal ("blanking") of the npov tags and of references. I implored them to add their material, but they didn't listen. I repeatedly stated that I consider it possible that their points are valid, but their edits are in violation of policy (sources, removals). I am thus only involved as far as policy is concerned. This has gone on for too long now, and I do think deliberate trolling should be met with blocks for disruption now. However, as long as you are watching the article, I will leave it to you, and I'll take a well-deserved break from this sad mess. dab (ᛏ) 13:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I note that you have blocked wisesabre for 24 hrs -- certainly deserved; but is nothing to be said about Those Others who revert the page a dozen times a day without self-declaring those actions to be reverts?? Your promptness in acting on that complaint will only reinforce their apparent belief of you being their comrade-in-arms. In this connection, may I bring to your attention the following message, which I had left on some other admin's page a few days ago? No action then ensued, but I am hoping for some further promptness from you. Perhaps I should also clarify, given the state of matters here, that I am actually of the same broad "identity group" as Bachmann's opponents, but cannot abide them....here is my message, dealing with your recent correspondent:

Could you take a view on this, this and the Talk:Rajput page in general? That user's discourse is in general informed by this orientation; the futility of engaging with him is arguably indicated by this, this and other such. I am anxious to see something done, since I hold the views expressed by him in the second paragraph here!! The said gentleman (sic), whose ascertainable contributions to WP began on 08/Dec/05, has filed a complaint alleging bias and incivility by Dbachmann (talk · contribs); do you think you could express a view on that complaint page? In that connection, reference to the contribution records of Shivraj Singh (talk · contribs) and Ss india (talk · contribs) may be useful. Regards, ImpuMozhi 05:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Furthermore, I will call your attention to this, addressed to a lady editor -- that user, another of the same group, was banned permanently; however, his edits continue under 210.187.49.65 (talk · contribs). Regards, ImpuMozhi 15:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Jeet Kune Do

I managed to add and correct some of the styles on the list of styles incorporated into Jeet Kune DO but Only 20 of the 26+4 styles are given,please can you help me find the remaining styles.

Thanks, Felbeast

JKD

Sorry man,I keep confusing you with Firestar WHY do admins keep such similar names???

You guy are crazy???? Felbeast 11:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

File:Ashida Kim Photo.gif

Ashida Kim

Ashida Kim page is constantly vandalised by someone named John PEterson Lloyd who keeps changing IP addresses he claimed that the image was copyright removed on 14:32, 18 December 2005 by 220.247.231.218 (Image is copyright) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast (talk • contribs)

I Like Anime

Greetings:

I just noticed, through a coincidental circumstance, that you deleted I Like Anime as a speedy delete, and cited A7 as your criteria.

Thing is, A7 only applies to biographical articles about individual people (or, now, quasi-biographical articles about bands and clubs). Even with the new expansion of its scope, it still does not cover "things". And as near as I can figure I Like Anime was an article about a "thing" rather than a person or a group of persons.

You may wish to restore the article and list it on AfD. There is a group of folks out there who seek any erroneous speedy deletion as a justification to cry for the complete dismantling of the speedy deletion process. AfD is generally the safer route.

All the best.
→ Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 13:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

BXML

User:Jan123 remade the article BXML again. Can you please have a look? -- Perfecto  15:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Is this username allowed

This is a sockpuppet I just created

Is the username allowed? If not I will simply not log on it again

I☺☻♠♣☻♣♦likeicecream 20:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Patrick Augustine Sheehan

Re-instated previous page deletion (nn-bio). Notable author, another editor and myself have done substantial work in creating a viable article. Dunno who the anon editor is, but the work is excellent & verifiable. Just FYI - Ali-oops^✍ 00:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks for the note! Appreciate it. Happy Christmas, BTW! :-) - Ali-oops^✍ 16:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)