28wikiedits28
January 2019
edit{{unblock|Your reason here}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You were unblocked because of your statement "I will not misbehave again", to which I responded "...of course you realize that if you repeat past behavior, then that will be it for you and Wikipedia..." You then edit warred again and did this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
28wikiedits28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was adding the Wikipedia member's marital information, I was not being disruptive. WalltfromDilbert is exagerrating and altering for no strong reason.
Decline reason:
rationale to follow. i type slowly -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC) reasoning for decline to follow, added post hoc So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time.
- You have not addressed the edit warring that partly led to your block.
- I can think of no reason to add a user's marital status. WP:outing probably applies.
- Well, the removed content from your talk page sheds some light.
- Looks like you edit warred AND blanked a user's talk page. Care to explain that faux pas?
- Nearly forgot this little bit of rudeness You should address that as well. (you misspelled "nincompoop").
- The final cherry-on-top is you don't understand that this all was disruptive. You cannot be unblocked w/o such understanding. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was adding the Wikipedia member's marital information, I was not being disruptive. WalltfromDilbert is exagerrating and altering for no strong reason.