2804:F14:C060:8A01:6806:8777:318E:F1A3

• Please see wp:burden. Your revert, without RS refs, violates it. 2603:7000:2143:8500:2432:BAE0:294F:5869 (talk) 07:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

  @2804:F14:C060:8A01:6806:8777:318E:F1A3

  Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references. Consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step.

  The overall state of that article is that it has no sources, possibly because the "source" was the external link that now doesn't work anymore, so I undid your seemingly random removals and added an unreferenced tag to the article, which to me appears the more correct procedure 🤷‍♀️.

  In my opinion if you come across an article that has no sources at all, then if it is not tagged as unreferenced you should tag it, and if it already has been tagged as unreferenced for a while THEN you escalate, and that escalation is probably not by deleting random parts of the text, but instead by nominating the article for deletion. – 2804:F14:C060:8A01:6806:8777:318E:F1A3 (talk) 07:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

---