2603:7000:1F00:6B91:7D96:D0FE:31F0:6D3D

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Big Daddy Kane. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2603:7000:1F00:6B91:7D96:D0FE:31F0:6D3D) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Right edits for the wrong reason

While you're justified in removing all those TV Tropes links, you have persistently cited the wrong reason. "Fancruft" has nothing to do with why we shouldn't have those links; as a reading of the relevant page would show, it's about adding arcana that doesn't really explain more about the subject.

TV Tropes cannot be used as a source since, as an open wiki, it is unreliable; likewise those links in the xlinks section violate criterion No. 12 of WP:ELNO.

It might be a good idea if you went back to every article you have removed the link from (which is, I see, basically every article you've edited today) and made a null edit clarifying the proper reason for the removal. I know this sounds like a superfluous request, but when making an edit like that soundly based on policy it's important to cite the right policy reason, as there are unfortunately people who might perceive you as a vandal or disruptive for doing so. Citing the right reason helps cut down on edit wars and other needless disputes. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Well, it is tedious, but so was me editing 50+ articles just to remove that website from it, and the overall plan to comb 100+ through the week, so I guess I'll go back and add null edits then.

Just so I don't make another mistake, I say "TV Tropes is an unreliable source per WP:RS|unreliable" and/or "WP:ELNO" in each new summary right? 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:7D96:D0FE:31F0:6D3D (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, depending. Actually, you know what ... just do that in the future. You don't need to go back, I think ... it doesn't seem like anybody's getting mad and reverting this. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Sure, btw are you in a position of authority in Wikipedia? and do you mind helping me clear references to the website on protected pages like List of Lilo & Stitch characters? 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:7D96:D0FE:31F0:6D3D (talk) 21:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

---