2601:642:C303:F370:A823:7B32:5A06:2402

Your edit to vasculitis

I noticed you changed a source I put into an article. Please don't do this as your new source does not verify all of the information. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense. It does. I have full access to those articles and have verified that they support the sentences. Between the two sources that are currently cited, all of the information is verified. If you are asserting that some of it isn't, please be specific as to which part. The article is from a good source and is newer. Please assume good faith and engage in discussion before wholesale reverting next time. I will gladly prove that the changes support the content if needed, but they do. Please remember that the article belongs to no one as discussed in WP:OWNERSHIP. This diff [1] seems problematic in that way when you say "one of my citations". 2601:642:C303:F370:A823:7B32:5A06:2402 (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

They don't. the source you added does not support crusting rhinorrhea and chronic otitis media. While the source may be newer the other source doesn't need to be updated as it was published within the last year. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I never claimed that the article belonged to me, I used the term "my citation" to indicate that I added it in and hence would know what kind of infromation was in the article. I went into more detail at ANI where I have brought up the issue. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Like I said, that still sounds like a WP:OWNERSHIP issue. Your escalation was unnecessary but fine. I can support what I added. 2601:642:C303:F370:A823:7B32:5A06:2402 (talk) 23:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

The WP:OWNERSHIP thing seems to be a difference of opinions so I won't argue with you about it. I went to ANI because this topic is approaching edit war territory and I'd rather not let it get to that point. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Based on the points you raised there, I think you could have specified those more clearly before escalating the issue to a forum like ANI and communicated your exact concerns more clearly. The response was very out of proportion when the quibbling is about subtle language differences in these citations. And yes, we'll have to agree to disagree re: the ownership issues. I see we clearly don't see eye-to-eye about that and likely won't regardless of further discussion. The initial diffs sounded pretty hostile and like they made some pretty significant assumptions about what I was or wasn't doing on my end "changing a citation without checking that the new source verifies all of the info. please stop changing sources without making sure that the new source covers all of the info". That doesn't seem like a great way to kick off an interaction or to collaborate. 2601:642:C303:F370:A823:7B32:5A06:2402 (talk) 00:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Your right I could have been more detailed with my responses. I will keep that in mind moving forward. With medical information "subtle" language differences can be very important, especially when changing a source. I do apologize if my intial edit summary sounded hostile as that was not my intent. My wording came from a place of "this doesn't verify everything" not from a place of assumptions. Regardless of my initial thoughts and wether or not I was making assumptions it is important to be careful when changing sources as the content may not be covered in the same way. I would also like to mention that editing without edit summaries (which I am also guilty of don't get me wrong), is not helpful with collaboration. Even the edit summary "update" does not give much information. If you are updating a source it may be helpful to give a reason why (usually updating sources is done when info has changed or the publication isn't within the past 10 years). IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

---