December 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Nepal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • Tacyarg, the edit was clearly explained. The content was added multiple times by sock puppets. You're welcome to restore it if you believe it's valid, but perhaps you could at least rewrite it so that it's a bit more coherent. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:958A:EACE:C5B4:402A (talk) 12:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, thanks for your reply. It looks fairly coherent to me - it's just the two sentences "Nepal's constitution doesn't give anyone the right to convert any person to another religion.Nepal also passed more stringent Anti conversion law on 2017" isn't it? The first sentence is slightly more informal than Wikipedia tends to be, but it's coherent. The second sentence has a couple of typos, which I will correct. I'm sorry, I couldn't see any explanation apart from the comment "block evasion; Undid revision 993941373 by Kingrocky2005", but am happy to acknowledge if I have missed something. Tacyarg (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply