2600:1700:8680:E900:31FD:426A:A851:1433
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2600:1700:8680:E900:31FD:426A:A851:1433 in topic Special:Contributions/2600:1700:8680:E900:0:0:0:0/64
- Are you going to tell them who you are more clearly so they can look at the edits of your account and judge whether IP socking has taken place? It has. I'll give further evidence after you state who you are. Then the dialog with the admins will be more meaningful. I had my reasons for not making it a checkuser block or blocking your account. I did not place IP socking in the block log on purpose; it was not something created to move the goal posts on you but the thing is that the warnings and problems that belong to your IPs also belong to your account in my eyes and the effect is cumulative. You don't get to dodge scrutiny here.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)- Well, now I know about this, I can sign my posts with my IP range. I stated I have a dynamic IP, originally signing my posts as OP or same IP person to avoid confusion, but User:Flyer22 Reborn recommended I sign normally. As far as I noticed, no one acted confused or mistaken about my identity. As for the rest of what you said Berean, I have no idea what you have gotten on about. I stated in the RfC I put up the NPOV banner on the article, which would require my account due to semi-protect. Anyone who cares enough could have checked the version history corresponding to when I started the RfC to figure out my account's identity. The only trouble my account has ever had, involved a Village Pump proposal some editors wanted to close without any discussion.
- - Reason for editing as IP -
- I want to set the precedent to show others they can express their morally controversial opinions anonymously as well. Hoping that if I experienced the ensuing discrimination for them while setting that precedent, then they might face less discrimination for their self-protective anonymity.
- I knew wikipedia has censorial corruption from my experience in Village Pump via my account. From that experience (which ultimately ended in an apology), I suspected even while following all the policies and guidelines, corrupt officials would want to find reasons as quickly as possible to censor my morally controversial POV.
- Berean, please iterate and explain without getting vague again: What problems "belong" to my IP?
- Are you going to tell them who you are more clearly so they can look at the edits of your account and judge whether IP socking has taken place? It has. I'll give further evidence after you state who you are. Then the dialog with the admins will be more meaningful. I had my reasons for not making it a checkuser block or blocking your account. I did not place IP socking in the block log on purpose; it was not something created to move the goal posts on you but the thing is that the warnings and problems that belong to your IPs also belong to your account in my eyes and the effect is cumulative. You don't get to dodge scrutiny here.
@Voice of Clam: may you please transcribe this message to the appropriate talk page since I cannot due to the block's effect?2600:1700:8680:E900:31FD:426A:A851:1433 (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |