The statement on the User page is wrong. The IP block/ban was of short duration and soon expired.

The user simply did not return, at least not under this IP number. Long afterwards, several other IP numbers were asserted to be the same person. This has never been confirmed, and various people including Jim Wales have publicly questioned the association of the earlier with the later rumoured identities.

To state that User:24 is subject of a present ban is thus simply incorrect. Correct it to the current policy statement regarding this user, please. If somehow someone has ruled that 24 "is" some other person or group of people, who says that, and, why does that imply a ban on this IP if it is no longer in that person/group's use?

Clarity is required here.

Wikipedia:List of banned users says that 24 is banned as a "sockpuppet" of EntmootsOfTrolls. Whether or not this is true is probably disputable, but they are indeed banned.[1] 24 at 20:40, 1 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

21:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

10:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)