You posted this on the evolution feedback page a few hours ago:
- Why don't the writers on this subject include contradictions, arguments and mistakes in regards to evolution theory. I will be very disappointed if Wiki is bias or one side. Thank You
That's because from a scientific standpoint, there are no major substantiated contradictions and mistakes in evolutionary theory, and the minor or unsubstantiated issues do not belong in an overview article. There is a brief discussion of the "arguments" as presented from a non-scientific perspective in this section and related articles: Evolution#Social_and_cultural_responses. Essentially, the point is that the article covers the science and theory of evolution, and not random objections presented by non-experts without scientific backing. This is not seen as a bias within Wikipedia's rules, as it is a policy to cover scientific subjects from a scientific perspective, and discuss secondary or sociological impacts separately from the actual content. 162.111.235.36 (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |