May 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Saddle River Township, New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tdl1060 (talk) 22:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

But why does Saddle River Township, New Jersey have to be separate from Saddle Brook, New Jersey? Why does Hohokus Township, New Jersey have to be separate from Mahwah, New Jersey? And why does Midland Township, New Jersey has to be separate from Rochelle Park, New Jersey? For example, Dover Township, New Jersey redirects to Toms River, New Jersey, Caldwell Township, New Jersey redirects to Fairfield Township, Essex County, New Jersey, Passaic Township, New Jersey redirects to Long Hill Township, New Jersey, North Plainfield Township, New Jersey redirects to Green Brook Township, New Jersey, and New Providence Township, New Jersey redirects to Berkeley Heights, New Jersey.

These townships were distinct entities with distinct histories. They did not merely undergo a name change. Dover Township merely changed its name to Toms River and Caldwell Township changed its name to Fairfield Township, but if there are any other former Townships that had been distinct entities that are currently redirects, articles could be created for these as well.--Tdl1060 (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Morphdog. I noticed that in this edit to Pompton Lakes High School, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Morphdogwhat did I do now? 15:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you don't even get it! I actually didn't remove it, I copied and pasted it to another section that mentions it.

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Thelost byte. I noticed that you recently removed content from Flutie Flakes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thelost byte (talk) 18:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The reason for blanking on it is because the sentences are blatant.

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Tomybrz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Whoomp! (There It Is) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tomybrz Bip Bip 16:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ziploc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. If you are unsure - dont remove, please take the discussion on the article talk page Baerentp (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ziploc, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tomybrz Bip Bip 16:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ziploc. Baerentp (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Kinetic37. I noticed that you recently removed content from Happy Together (song) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kinetic37 (talk) 16:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

But this is why Commercials I Hate and Am I Right exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.251.72 (talkcontribs)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Together (song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Whether you hate these commercials or not doesn't matter, don't remove sourced content. Kinetic37 (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

So this is why Commercials I Hate and Am I Right exist. Because of commercials songs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.251.72 (talkcontribs)

Please explain why it constitute the removal of the section. INeedSupport :3 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Together (song). MilkGames (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MilkGames (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
By the way, who's "we"? INeedSupport :3 17:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:24.115.251.72 reported by User:INeedSupport (Result: ). Thank you. INeedSupport :3 17:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Disruptive editing

edit

Pleasure stop arbitrarily removing information about song use in commercials. You've been warned and blocked for this before. It's utterly irrelevant that there's other sites out there that cover such information - everything on Wikipedia is covered in other sources. You need to provide a valid rationale (you not liking it doesn't matter) for such removals, and mass removal of such information needs a broader consensus (e.g., at a relevant wikiproject). --Xanzzibar (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Xanzzibar (talk) 17:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply