217.121.17.136

Population-related graphs should be placed in the population section, not in the vital statistics section. I moved those charts to the population section. Ripas1997 (talk 16:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC) oke217.121.17.136 (talk) 14:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Demography of the United Kingdom

Sorry, I got a bit scratchy, as I wanted to add the 2016 ethnicity estimates, pending the 2021 Census results (which I've now done). Having gone back over you edits, yes, they are an improvement. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Demographics of Brazil. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Friedlemon⭐ ^💬 20:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Demographics of China, you may be blocked from editing. Greenman (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Demographics of Bulgaria

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Demographics of Bulgaria, you may be blocked from editing. As I've seen on User_talk:Timelapse1, you've been warned last year that your datas on migration rates and population change rates are incorrect. If you insist with your disruptive edits, I'll have to report you for vandalism to the administrators. Givibidou (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

What is the issue, you see that the data are based on the data of natural change and population growth as reported in first column. So this is just mathematics. If you say that the data are incorrect, then also the reported annual population is incorrect. I see this more as crude number% that is the best migration estimation for that peroid in time, that is based on the data of the previous columns. You find this incorrect, but how do you see this? What is your proposal? Can you elaborate this a bit more? 217.121.17.136 (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

---