July 2024

edit

  Hello, 2003:C6:BF0B:A500:DA43:AEFF:FE4C:3229, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your editing pattern indicates that you're not interested in improving the quality of the article. You're reverting in a very biased manner without providing clear explanations, you're offending people in a very impolite manner by this. I'd like to escalate this case to administrators. There is for sure a policy on wikipedia that allows to block such non-contributors. 2003:C6:BF0B:A500:DA43:AEFF:FE4C:3229 (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:ANI would be the place. MrOllie (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
ok, I'll go through it later. Is there any reason why you're not providing any concrete arguments for you claims and actions? 2003:C6:BF0B:A500:DA43:AEFF:FE4C:3229 (talk) 19:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The promotion and sockpuppetry is obvious. You don't get to ignore the COI guidelines by logging out and pretending you're a different person. Until you take the time to read, understand, and follow Wikipedia policy in this matter there's nothing to 'argue'. MrOllie (talk) 19:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I didn't log out no do I pretend to be a "different person" - you're arguments following these wrong statement are of no use (Ex falso quodlibet). Wrong information about the project LabPlot was obvious - the current version of LabPlot doesn't use QSA, Qqt3d, etc. It's simply wrong and it was corrected now. Please provide _concrete_ arguments and help to improve the article. I don't ask you to 'argue'. 2003:C6:BF0B:A500:DA43:AEFF:FE4C:3229 (talk) 19:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I simply do not believe you. You should go ahead and make that ANI report now. MrOllie (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
For believes you need to reach out to the church next to you. I'm representing a different community and I'm referring to facts, not to believes. You should have enough intelligence to cross check the facts and don't argue with believes. You disqualified yourself completely now for a constructive discussion and proved again you're not interested at all in improving the quality of the article. 2003:C6:BF0B:A500:DA43:AEFF:FE4C:3229 (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. MrOllie (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply