Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2001:BB6:4713:4858:448B:FB03:FDF2:5AE6) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! PATH SLOPU 10:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

I reverted your edit because it seemed unconstructive. It was an accidental edit summary. I removed that warning also. If you are sure that your edit is in good faith, you can revert my edit. Regards, --PATH SLOPU 10:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why I reverted your edit edit

Sorry for reverting that edit on Janet Leach (appropriate adult) (I was looking at the source text and thought that your edit would cause a bug). That was caused by my method of reverting vandalism. By the way, I noticed that you had violated the three-revert-rule when editing that page (An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior.) the rule is mentioned here: Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule. I agree that your edits were constructive, but you had still violated the rule. Please avoid doing that in the future (in this case, I suggest trying to convince an editor who reverts your work that he shouldn’t have reverted it, then editing the page. Regards, User:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 User talk:RedBulbBlueBlood9911, 07:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply