2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48

April 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ISOCELL have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: ISOCELL was changed by 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951122 on 2024-04-07T12:10:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

report sent, as I have said in the edit log, this list should be removed to adhere to the rules which where set forth in the exmor talk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Exmor 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ISOCELL. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you please elaborate on why this is supposedly vandalism. As with the provided link, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Exmor lists about camera sensors are not allowed, therefore this should be removed.

Not removing this would be hypocritical and inconsistent. 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Where exactly in the provided talk page does it say such lists are not allowed? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

It is on the start of page, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Exmor#:~:text=A%20RfC%20was%20completed%20in%20January%202023%20that%20determined%20that%20the%20page%20should%20not%20have%20a%20list%20of%20sensors%20on%20the%20page.%20A%20new%20consensus%20should%20be%20generated%20on%20the%20talk%20page%20before%20adding%20a%20list%20of%20sensors%20to%20the%20article.

"""

Product catalogue

A RfC was completed in January 2023 that determined that the page should not have a list of sensors on the page. A new consensus should be generated on the talk page before adding a list of sensors to the article.

"""

Wikipedia should be consistent here, with the current consensus, this list is not allowed, leaving this list up here would be inconsistent and hypocritical. 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 13:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

The consensus was for the article Exmor, not the one you edited, ISOCELL. See WP:OTHER. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Why would the rules be different for this article? What is the purpose of inconsistent ruling?

Both articles are about the same topic, just different vendors, therefore the same rules should apply. 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately that isn't how things work here on Wikipedia. See the page I linked for more information. In short, just because article X uses something doesn't mean article Y should use the same thing, even if they cover similar topics. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:OTHER mentions the deletion of entire articles and not sections within articles.

WP:OTHER is about not apples to apples comparisons, like in one of the examples where they compare a CEO to an activist. You can not reasonably compare a CEO to an activist.

In this case the two subjects are very much comparable as both are about the same product types, so the same rules should apply.

Either both lists should stay up or both lists should be removed. As there is a precedence with the sony exmore talk, the consistent way of ruling should be to use that precedence and remove the product list here as well, see also WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:NOTDATABASE 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 13:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:OTHER has made the issue clear and your "both articles" argument is against it. If you insist on removing the information, at least start a discussion on its talk page. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I have just started that on the discussion page, this should be removed here.

Also just linking to WP:OTHER seems like a quick way to just ignore any criticism.

Also as said, this is still infringing on WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:NOTDIRECTORY, so even if the WP:OTHER argument is invalid, it still infringes the general rules and should be removed.

Please do not ignore those other which I have linked. It makes no sense to just link to WP:OTHER and then to conveniently disregard the three other links provided. 2001:9E8:3494:27FA:74BD:16FF:402E:DB48 (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I understand. Wait until other editors discuss on the talk page, and remove the content when consensus has been reached. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---