2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D

Dozen sources

Hi there! Could you let me know what reliable sources say CRT doesn’t exist? Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Watch any news outlet, bro. CNN, MSNBC, whatever fits your style 2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

In other words, you have nothing. clpo13_(talk) 18:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

wait... do you imply that CNN isn't a reliable source? 2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (talk) 18:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

If that's what you got out of my comment, it's clear you're not here in good faith. clpo13_(talk) 18:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Talk:Critical race theory.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13_(talk) 18:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why do i get blocked for clpo13 himself assuming bad faith and attacking? He asked for a source, i told him to check out CNN, MSNBC or any other mainstream media platform of his choice, and he replied with an assumption of bad faith. Great job. 2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (talk) 18:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand WP:CITE and WP:RS. It's your responsibility to provide reliable sources, not other people's. Yamla (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Since when do you hand out bans for WP:RS, especially on a user talk page? And i assume you haveno issue with clpo13 assuming bad faith? 2001:871:237:2AF5:AD5B:2170:74F:CE7D (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We hand out blocks(not bans, which are different) to prevent disruption. Picking political fights in a non-collaborative manner is disruptive. Go do that on Facebook or Trump's social network and stay comfortable in your bubble, only hearing what you want to hear, which further divides us just as our enemies want. Furthermore, see WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---