Welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you are making changes to referenced information, so I have reverted some of your changes. Note that as long as you make such changes, you are likely to be reverted. Please register an account and use the talkpages instead of the edit summaries.--Berig (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks. I'm just making casual changes to things I end-up reading and which I see that stand out as contradicting what is known and stated about the topics, even on the same or other articles here on Wikipedia. Some of the "referenced information" I removed fit under such category: they stand out as contradictory to what is said elsewhere. I could provide some references to supplant them if I took the time, but they are just so wrong that they often contradict the information (even basic information) on the very article they are from or other Wikipedia articles. That is why I feel they should be outright removed - such as mentions of Vanir outside Old Norse culture, mentions of the Vanir as unwarlike & so forth.

I will still remove the Neorxnawang entry from the Anglo-Saxon paganism template because, as the very first line on the article says: "Neorxnawang (also Neorxenawang and Neorxnawong) is an Old English noun used to translate the Christian concept of paradise in Anglo-Saxon literature" it is a translation of a christian concept and the article or any references found doesn't provide ample evidence of this being a belief and term that ever saw widespread use among Anglo-Saxon pagans of the era. 14:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC).

You sound like a person who really should get an account and start being an active editor.:-)--Berig (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply