Welcome

edit
Hello, 185.176.244.66, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

185.176.244.66, good luck, and have fun. Ebyabe (talk) 05:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Deonna Purrazzo has been reverted.
Your edit here to Deonna Purrazzo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/_DeonnaPurrazzo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2018

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Enzo Amore. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 18:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Deonna Purrazzo have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Deonna Purrazzo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/_DeonnaPurrazzo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Subheaders

edit

Please do not add random subheaders as you did here and here. Here and here you added an empty header the same level as the other header, which is also incorrect. The purpose of a subheader is to ease the flow for the reader. When there is only one subheader it is useless and should not be added. Thanks - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 20:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. Your recent edit(s) to the page Christmas and holiday season appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Tendentious editing

edit

I suggest limiting the use of the Amhara genocide article talk page for extensive and multiple sections in which most of them are arguably opinions (see Wikipedia:Too_long;_didn't_read; Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Non-compliance). Here is Wikipedia’s another guideline for behaviors of tendentious editing: Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing. As it sits right now, the very long multiple sections that you created are difficult to follow, and will become inconvenient when it is time to close the discussions. Please improve the layout and the volume. You could be blocked if you keep using the articles talk page for Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing. Recommendations for constructive discussions has been suggested to you in the Talk page. I see that as a logical approach that editors could follow. Petra0922 (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply