The approach of this article as currently worded appears highly ideological and agenda driven. Terms like "slaughter" aren't value neutral, as an encyclopedia should be. My disputed edits retained all mentions of killings and numerical figures without using charged language. The structure of the article as I originally found it was heavily unbalanced. It gave no historical context or normal encyclopedic facts for example. It jumped straight into (probably disputed) accounts of bloodshed. Clearly the intent is to make an emotional point, not educate readers about a historic event. Also, the majority of sources used don't appear to be academic. And since they aren't in English, few people on English Wikipedia can verify their contents.
"Slaughter" does not belong in any encyclopedia heading. You don't see that on other pages with far greater (and less controversial) violence involved.
Welcome to this talk page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Use this page to start a discussion about the edits made from this IP address. What you say here will be public for others to see. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several people.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |