The article states the number of joints incorrectly
editThe article states both that the number of joints is variable, and then that the number is exactly 360. Though the number is referenced, the only sources are a single scientific article ("Speed-dependent and mode-dependent modulations of spatiotemporal modules in human locomotion extracted via tensor decomposition") that itself does not reference its own number, and an online Q&A forum site. No other reference sources provide this exact number, but instead vary the number depending on what is considered to be a joint and the age of the subject. Most likely, the addition of the exact number was added by a Muslim who was trying to support the Hadiths that claim the 360 number given by Mohammed. I move to strike this exact number for lack of references, and shall do so if nobody else contradicts this by providing here more references that support the assertion that the number is exactly "360". I shall return in one-week's time.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |