About Panathinaikos

edit

Please watch your expressions at the edit summary. No swearing towards a living person is allowed, or Wikipedia could be sued. Thank you. As for the part about Tsakas, it exists because it shows the grim financial situation of the club and the attempts of the owner (by the way, is there any source which says that Panathinaikos is still owned by Tzigger?) to sell it. Feel free to rephrase that part if you wish, but don't remove it entirely, as it is adequately sourced and doesn't give undue weight to him (it's one sentence long after all). Cheers. Kosm1fent 12:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Σε αυτό που λες έχεις δίκιο. Γενικά όλη η ενότητα της ιστορίας του Παναθηναϊκού μετά το 2000 πρέπει να ξαναγραφεί, με μόνο τα σημαντικότερα γενονότα της σύχρονης ιστορίας να αναγράφονται. Επίσης, οι μετοχές του Βαρδινογιάννη μεταφέρθηκαν στο Σωματείο Φίλων Παναθηναϊκού υπό τον Αλαφούζο την Τρίτη: [1] Τέλος, εδώ είναι η Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια, οπότε πρέπει να γράφεις στα Αγγλικά όσο γίνεται.
(Translation from Greek: You are right. Generally, the whole section of Panathinaikos' history after 2000 should be rewritten, with only the most important events mentioned. Also, Vardinogiannis' stocks were transfered to Giannis Alafouzos on Tuesday (link). Finally, this is the English Wikipedia, so you should use English.) Kosm1fent 12:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please do not leave any more potentially libellous edit summaries, whether in English or Greek. I have removed two that caused concern - please read the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy which applies everywhere on this project. Edit summaries are there for editors to describe what changes they have made, nothing else. Also, as Kosm1fent has said, you are required to speak English when contributing to the English Wikipedia as only a small minority of editors speak Greek. CT Cooper · talk 13:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply