December 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.67.41.100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Telling the truth is not vandalism. Funny how Wikipedia has an instant-undo for changes that don't conform to the status quo. There's even a Wiki page about status quo stonewalling :) 173.67.41.100 (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This has nothing to do with changes that don't conform to "the status quo"; this has to do with the clear vandalism that you engaged in. If you think that talking about "liberal vermin" is valid content, there is no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you, and I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.67.41.100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is not the first time a change I have made (legitimate change) has been reverted near-instantly and my IP blocked for actually correcting an error on a page. It seems that Wikipedia has no interest in points of view outside its own view in whichever context is currently appropriate. I cite the edit to this talk page that says I won't do this again as the reason to be unblocked. But if it's rejected that's ok. Have a good day. :) Sorry if I offended you 331dot. 173.67.41.100 (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you think your edits were legitimate then you have no place on Wikipedia. Block extended, talk page access revoked to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yamla (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ut just FYI .. I won't do it again. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity :)