172.58.46.169

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

172.58.46.169 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So making "constructive edits" gets me blocked. What a screwed up system. (And no, I'm not referring to this IP's edits).

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sequence of events: vandalism -> block. You should know that. What happened to you? You used to be fairly constructive, now you're just trolling. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 04:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your current block is basically for threatening to kill an editor and their family. What I said is that you used to be constructive. Now you're just trolling. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 05:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

---