155.39.88.241

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Shields (baseball), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tampabay721 (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James Shields (baseball). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tampabay721 (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

It's constructive to point out that the nickname's genesis isn't substantiated in a real pattern, just media hype. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.39.88.241 (talk • contribs) 19:26, April 8, 2009

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of mutual-fund families in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Olivier Bommel (talk) 19:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2012

Hello, I'm Zepppep. I noticed that you made a change to an article, James Shields (baseball), but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zepppep (talk) 20:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

---