Empress Consort

edit

  This message replicates the level two warnings posted at User talk:148.225.101.1 and at User talk:148.225.101.2 and at Talk:Emperor Kōmei:

Your recent edit to Emperor Kōmei is not constructive and has been reverted.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
I note with dismay that serial edits have been reverted; but since the last time, I added in-line citations which support the factual basis of the paragraph you keep changing -- see User talk:148.225.101.1.
I hope this warning will be sufficient to end this pointless vandalism. --Tenmei (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wikipelli. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Chicharrón with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 17:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Free verse. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Electric Catfish 17:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Free verse, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Electric Catfish 17:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Free verse, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Administrator's warning

edit

Hi. I am an administrator who has been asked to review your account for possible blocking. I see that you seem to be engaged in an editing dispute with other editors.

Please make no further edits to any Wikipedia articles for now without first gaining consensus for them on the article talk pages (such as Talk:Free verse) from other, established editors. Otherwise, I or another administrator may block this account without further warning.

Thank you,
--A. B. (talkcontribs) 00:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply