February 2022

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring and sockpuppetry concerns regarding Incegnetty (talk · contribs).
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

142.112.224.196 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP has no involvement and is not linked to the sock master. Please unblock because it is an error. 142.112.224.196 (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Clear and blatant involvement. Yamla (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.