August 2019

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at They Don't Care About Us. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: They Don't Care About Us was changed by 122.53.59.169 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-08-09T15:21:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at This Is It (Michael Jackson song). - FlightTime (open channel) 13:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Template:Michael Jackson songs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2008 in film. Robvanvee 13:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 14:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply