June 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Biscoe Islands. Straight to level 4. This is obviously the same user who just reached level 4 for these edits using a named account. Meters (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Third World, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 edit

 
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Free Republic of Verdis. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Pls do note remove the afd template. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

New message from CASSIOPEIA edit

 
Hello, 120.146.29.20. You have new messages at CASSIOPEIA's talk page.
Message added 08:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

New message from CASSIOPEIA edit

 
Hello, 120.146.29.20. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Republic of Verdis.
Message added 08:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019 edit

  Hello, 120.146.29.20, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Thonkingman (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DaßWölf 09:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I have had multiple accounts in the past but I only plan to stick to this one now. The previous were basically just temporary accounts when I didn't know much about wikipedia and never intended to keep a permanent account. It was only to write stuff back. I only intend to use this account now as I don't remember any old accounts. I do not plan to have any accounts in the future. I plan to be a loyal wikipedia editor and contributor, which I have already made efforts with by accepting certain redirect requests along with fixing grammar mistakes and nationality mistakes. - Thonkingman
In that case Thonkingman I have to remind you that you're at three reverts at the border dispute page:
 
Your recent editing history at Croatia–Serbia border dispute shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DaßWölf 10:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
My apologies. I will not edit war again. - Thonkingman