August 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Leopard 2E, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denniss (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leopard 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Type 99 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have my information from my reference and you dont accept it

edit

(moved from user talk:Jim1138 by Jim1138)
it is real if you open my reference; i have a reference, that is not vandalism, im contributing information, you dont want; then ok no if you dont want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.211.224.251 (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The numbers you added are not supported and are contradicted by your (and other) references on that page. Significant information must be supported by external citations. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, reliable sources,citing sources, and wp:five pillars Thank you