107.127.46.10

Talk:Alexander Technique

Hello, I'm Hipal. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. See also WP:TALK, WP:AGF, and WP:HARASS --Hipal (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Alexander technique page

Removed edit:

"If you want to draw the inference that the advocates making claims off the back of improper evidence are making "false claims", that would be reasonable. Trying to shut that implication down is WP:PROFRINGE POV pushing."

There seems to be some tension between editors as to what evidence is improper. Typically RCTs in peer-reviewed journals have been rejected here as only systematic reviews are allowed for wiki MED:RS.

That said editors are very selective about which systematic reviews they want to accept. The NHS statement is based on the systematic review of Woodman and Moore but for some reason is rejected by the editors, for example.

Some editors of this page have a hard time discriminating between quackery and legitimate practices well which is documented in their respective talk pages (many of them have been banned for coordinated editing of related pages). 107.127.46.10 (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

---