February 2021

edit

  Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'm the one from 99.239.158.18 . Thanks for intervening on my behalf, and sorry they blocked you for that. This whole thing seems very irrational. First they scornfully did undo my edit without indicating clearly the "talk" for the article, there are 1000 talk links in that page; not to mentioned the burden of proof is on them to prove the source not on me who I read the source and found no such indication as they claimed in the article. That pissed me off as you could see. And they played god to my user page, blocked me for 31 hours. Finally I found the said "talk" page and repeated my point, nobody seems to understand such a simple thing... if you don't have clear proof from a source, then that's not a source!. I don't think I'm going to waste any more time on this garbage site administered by garbage-mind people. But I'll remind them at the end of the year when they'll beg for $3.99 donation - they don't deserve even $0.000000001 for their dishonesty. Thanks again 103.150.187.3 , and Farewell!


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.158.18 (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

But I'll remind them at the end of the year when they'll beg for $3.99 donation - they don't deserve even $0.000000001 for their dishonesty. The problem is that the administrator who blocked you is not a representative of the WMF at all, and presumably couldn't care less about the WMF receiving a donation or not. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 23:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The WMF is not cash-poor, in part because the community doesn't hesitate to intervene to remove editors who can't get along with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply