Please do not upload images with the incorrect licence as you did with Image:Peterpic.jpg. The image is copyrighted and a free use image is already available (Image:Peter Beattie orig.jpg), therefore:

Image:Peterpic.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Peterpic.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 12:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

its copywright? how do you know? please direct me to the page that says this.

Speedy deletion of Eoin Mcgovern

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Eoin Mcgovern, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Drivenapart 10:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Eoin Mcgovern

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Eoin Mcgovern, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Drivenapart 10:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007

edit

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Eoin Mcgovern, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drivenapart 10:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

February 2008

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indooroopilly State High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Indooroopilly State High School was changed by 000lynx (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-19T23:09:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to People's Republic of China, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 23:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

000lynx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yeah, I'm sorry about those edits on Indooroopilly High School, and peoples republic of china, im at school and people were using my computer. Sorry about that :(. Also in fairness, i was given a last warning, and you blocked me anyway. Please unblock this wont happen again.

Decline reason:

We take account integrity very seriously. What steps are you taking to ensure this won't happen again? Without details, no admin will unblock. Reply below, don't use another unblock for that. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.