Just so you know, I've moved your article about the "String theory" novels to String theory (novels), and turned the "String Theory" article back into a redirect to String theory. I also added a note early in your article about the novels mentioning that they take place in the Star Trek: Voyager universe; that's a rather important fact about them! (Assuming I have that right: I've never heard of the books myself.) You might want to do a spell check of your article at some point, and eventually you'll want to link to other Wikipedia articles appropriately (as I have with the "Voyager" link; you can copy the syntax from there). Best wishes!--Steuard 21:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ha ha. Now you're caught red handed insulting me!!! Delete it or do it again & you will be blocked for both sexual & bad taste harrassment... Just so you know..... Bye, Spawn Man 00:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)....Reply

Image licensing edit

"Permission" for Image:Gcif.jpg isn't good enough, to be legally covered we need the photographer to choose a desired license, such as GFDL, CC. etc. Stan 18:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I'll delete the current image and take a picture myself after the break.


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sting Theory Book 2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Sting Theory Book 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:String Theory Book 3.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:String Theory Book 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fellow Doctor Who Fan edit

Hello Doctor. You know it's funny my nickname at school is The Doctor and your name here is the Doctor. Now onto buisness, I was wondering if there is a userbox that would say this users favorite Doctor is the Tenth Doctor. If you can find out somehow if there is I would appreciate the help, and please leave a message concering this matter on my talk page please! God Bless! The K.O. King (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Sting Theory Book 1.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sting Theory Book 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 20:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply