I recently removed an edit you made to the spectral line article. The table you added did not have a clear relevance to that article. The article is discussing the concept of spectral lines in a broad sense, and your table appeared to related to a specific spectroscope technique. If you can provide me some context about the information you wanted to add, I may be able to suggest how to incorporate it, possibly into another article related to spectroscopy.

Thanks for your interest in spectroscopy on Wikipedia. ronningt (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I took a look at the reference you provided. The information you are presenting is correct, but I am concerned that it does not enhance the introduction to this article and that is being presented out of context. The data on those spectral lines is highly specific to radio-spectroscopy. Therefore, I do not feel that table belongs in the introduction to the topic of spectral line. This article and topic need to start out broad, since the term has many applications. Please take a look at this section of the astronomical spectroscopy article. I think the information could be included there and would fit better into that more specific article. If you think that's a reasonable placement, I'm happy to help generate some discussion to provide context for the data. ronningt (talk) 14:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian rupee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silver purchase act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2020 edit

  Your addition to Quinine has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply