March 2019
edit
Hello, I'm Natureium. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, People-first language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Natureium. Yes, I believe it's a mistake so have reversed the deletions. Basically the point I'm making there is a logical clarification: it doesn't require a source because the logic is self-evident. Arguably the last part (about the aims of people-first language) is an empirical claim and so does require a source; but it is reiterating (as part of the logical clarification) what has already been outlined (with references) in the article: it doesn't introduce any new empirical claims. If you believe this makes it unnecessary (i.e. if you can follow the argument without that closing summary) please delete it again. The first part however is a logical clarification rather than an empirical claim so does not depend upon support from academic literature or other sources. Ψμον (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)